Healthcare Utilization and Finance Essays - Health, Personal Life

Healthcare Utilization and Finance Amara Smallcombe In healthcare today, it is very important that healthcare providers, especially nurses, have an understanding of the matters pertaining to healthcare financi ng . Knowing and understanding each of these policies and all involved which affect essential delivery of healthcare puts the nurse in a better position to advocate for the patient and their family so that each of their healthcare needs may be met . It was once said that America was the greatest country in the world, but in comparison in healthcare, does this still reign true? Because we live and work here in the U.S., we know and understand our healthcare system a little bit more, but does that mean it's better than other countries? Let's compare, for example, Great Britain. A2. Access In America, healthcare is looked upon as a privilege and not a basic human right. Everyone in the U.S. is responsible for their own healthcare coverage. For those who have jobs, usually the employer pays a portion of the coverage and the rest is left to the individual. For those whom do not fall into this category: children, unemployed, and retired, differe nt programs are available through funding from taxes . For children, if their parents are within a certain wage bracket, they are eligible to receive assistance through Medicaid, CHIPS, and even other programs aimed at preventative measures, such as WIC. Unemployed adults may also receive Medicaid without the assistance of the other programs, but, may also receive assistance to purchase healthy foods to maintain heath. For retired persons, programs such as Social Security and Medicare provide healthcare options. Through these programs, most medications are paid for, however, it is at the discretion of these progra ms what will be paid for, i.e. brand name vs. generic. Access of care through the ER is surprisingly speedy with an average wait time of 58mins. But, if an emergency situation is not what is being experienced, the average time it takes to get in to see a primary care physician (PCP) is 19.5 days. (AIMS, 2015) This information is important because if further assessment is necessary and a specialist must get involved, a special referral from the PCP is required. After obtaining the referral, another waiting period on average of 16.8 to 28.8 days may be implemented. (AIMS, 2015) In reality, just to get in to see a specialist may take as long as 48.3 days. Prior to January 1, 2014, anyone with a pre-existing health con dition could be denied coverage for that condition or any thing relating to such . After the implementation of Obamacare, this statute was reversed. It is now the law that " health insurance companies can't refuse to cover you or charge you more j ust because you have a "pre-existing condition" that is, a health problem you had before the date that new health coverage starts. They also can't charge women more than men. " ( HHS, 2016) It is no secret that healthcare reform needs consideration. In comparison with America, Great Britain does not see healthcare in the same light. " The British National Healthcare System is a social insurance system that operates on the belief that healthcare is a right, not a privilege. " (AIMS, 2015) Their system is similar to our Social Security and Medicaid here in the U.S. whereas everyone pays into it and everyone receives treatment, no one is turned away. Services are "free" for all at the time it is rendered and is paid for through taxation. (AIMS, 2015) This system is publicly funded and each of the healthcare workers are considered public servants. The coverage is the same whether you are a child/ adult, employed/ unemployed, or retired. Because of this, the citizens of Great Britain pay about 9% of their gross income, which is 4% greater than the average cost of American health coverage. The only way to be able to see a specialist is also by referral. To do this the general practitioner (GP) must be seen. However, unlike the U.S., a specialist may only be seen if the GP agrees that you need to see one. Going to see a specialist without the "consent", if

Original Writing Poetry Heartache My life was happy with no pain at all Essays

Original Writing Poetry Heartache My life was happy with no pain at all Essays Original Writing Poetry Heartache My life was happy with no pain at all Essay Original Writing Poetry Heartache My life was happy with no pain at all Essay Essay Topic: Heart Of Darkness The Heart Goes Last My life was happy with no pain at all, Not having any worries of the darkness that crawls Beneath my shadow and dark secrets to come Is the cause of my feelings becoming so numb Then something had to destroy my happiness Now feeling so empty and eternally stressed Like being suffocated by my own mistakes And having to feel them is more than can take With each day ending in a hurtful flow Not knowing how long I have left to go Wondering when all this stress will decrease So I can once again live my life at ease Bur right now my emotions are swollen As though as each part of my heart has been stolen Thrown away to the gates of hell Where feelings of betrayal live and dwell Ill never forget the feelings of this pain Feelings as though as I have nothing to gain But in reality Im afraid to let go Not wanting to live in bitterness and sorrow But life goes on and so will u Having no need for me to cry Ill get on with my life and not be stuck in the past Because life is short and I want to make It last.

Criminal law Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Criminal law - Coursework Example As such Ben will be guilty of unlawful manslaughter, which becomes manifest when one focuses on committing a less crime yet ends up killing someone. As such, it is evident that death arises from an act of omission. Indeed, the stipulations indicate that the criminal may have embraced dangerous activities, which in turn resulted in death. It is evident that Ben’s intention was noble since he was propagating nobility among the populace whilst dealing with animals. However, using a bomb was rather dangerous since the likelihood of death is increasingly high. According to Michaelides-Mateou and Mateou (2010, p 25) Ben may have acted in conformity with mens rea since the act arose from recklessness and failure to foresee the likely repercussions of his actions. In order for Ben’s action to constitute constructive manslaughter, it is paramount to acknowledge that Ben must have committed an unlawful act. As such, the placing of the bomb is unlawful since it distorts the working capacity of the individuals. Such an unlawful act ought to be combined with recklessness. It is evident that Ben failed to consider that a bomb specialist might be dispatched to the area to address the fears. Ben’s intellect failed since he was focusing on the broader picture whilst shunning the chances of individual sufferers. An analysis of diverse cases such as (R v Franklin [1883]) offers insight into constructive manslaughter (Michaelides-Mateou and Mateou 2010, p 25). In such a case, the defendant’s actions were objectively determined to discover their motive, which turned out to be appropriate but fuelled by recklessness. The second crime pertains to criminal negligence since Ben acknowledged the danger that may have arisen from his actions but went ahead instituting such a crime. This means that Ben knows that his omission would lead to death. This is

The Fugitive Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The Fugitive - Movie Review Example As a suspect, police arrests Kimble and accuses him of having committed the murder of his own wife. Without having a sound reason for suspecting or arresting Kimble, the police convict him and the court sentences Kimble to death. The police carries him to the prison where he would wait till he is executed. In the bus in which Kimble is taken to the prison, there happen to be three prisoners in addition to Kimble. They mutually prepare a plan of escaping from the bus. This causes the bus driver to lose control of the bus and the bus slips off the embankment and gets crashed on the way to the jail. This provides Kimble with a chance to escape. Kimble manages to break free of the hold of police and runs away. Deputy Samuel Gerard who is also in Chicago assumes the responsibility of finding and arresting Kimble ninety minutes after Kimble’s escape. During this time, instead of relying on the capability of police, Kimble commences an investigation on his own and tries to find out t he murderer of Helen. In this course, Kimble is also keen to involve Deputy Samuel Gerard and other members in his team. The police do not accede to his proposal and the Deputy constantly follows Kimble. This leaves Kimble with no choice but to keep away from all of his relatives and fellows. Kimble leaves no stone unturned in his efforts of catching the murderer. Meanwhile, the Deputy also starts to believe that the case is indeed more complicated and vague than he had originally anticipated. His ingenuity and uninterrupted determination gain fruition and Kimble reaches the conclusion that there is no one in this world that he can trust. The murderer ultimately discovered turns out to be a one-armed man. The concept has been derived from a television series that was telecast in 1960s. In that series, the title role was played by late David Jansen. However, the story has been too modified to leave any touch of the original source of idea. In that series, the adventure was narrated w eek after week of Jansen’s escape, and there was much more to attract the audience than simply the murderer’s chase unlike this two hour film, in which chasing the real criminal is the focus of the plot. The Fugitive is an exceptional movie based on murder investigation. Among all scenes in the movie, the ones that were shot before the commencement of the chase are the most dramatic and purposefully included. Everything that is related to the assassination is clearly conveyed to the audience in a prologue of no more than fifteen minutes. The scenes are quite well-edited. The doctor has to cope with two miseries simultaneously. He is convicted for the murder of his beloved wife. In such tough circumstances, he makes rational decisions which lead him to success in the long run. The opening scenes are followed by a non-stop thrill made by the Deputy and his men for about thirty minutes. These scenes are full of energy and the audience keeps on the seats’ edges. The speed of action considerably fades away in the second hour of the movie as Kimble starts finding the one armed man. However, giving this portion of the story more time does make sense as most of the problems of the movie are engrossed in this part. The performance of Harrison Ford in this movie is much more emotional than it was in Patriot Games. The performance that is indeed, most worthy of discussion and appreciation is that of Tommy Lee Jones. He had been struggling for a couple of years until 1993, when his superb performance in this movie became a potential

1947 U.N.'s Special Commission on Palestine Essay

1947 U.N.'s Special Commission on Palestine - Essay Example The government of British had earlier also made a recommendation to establish a special committee which was to prepare a report for General assembly. UNSCOP was set up by the General Assembly to investigate the root and possibly a solution for the Palestine’s conflict. UNSCOP is making up of representatives from 11 nations. Our visit as a commission included gathering of testimonies from organization of Zionists was boycotted by the higher committee of Arab. This paper work gives the assessment of the four options, which are Arab rule; Zionist rule; a bi-national state. Discussion The 19th century came with it the Palestinian- Israel conflict. In 1920 this conflict bore violence which is still continuing today. The Jews and the Arabs formed movement in the 29th century. These movements fought towards attaining their respective people’s sovereignty. Hallowed land and Zionism are some of the major causes of this conflict. The Great Britain allowed the Jews to immigrate to Palestinian land on which they had control. This conflict escalated when over 6 million Jews lost their lives on the hands of the Nazis on a Holocaust. Afterwards the Jews were allowed to migrate into Palestine. It was then that Israel was established, on Palestine’s land. This led to onset of a war that has born various battles and attacks of land in the region. Lots of Palestine citizens have become refugees in Middle East since 1948. It was in 148 that Israel established itself as a nation. Palestine use force to try and reclaim a land that was once theirs from the Jews. They also fight for the refugees who are still suffering yet they have their lands (Zanotti, 2010). During a talk with the British, the Arabs insisted on a unitary majority state for Arabs. Officials representing Palestine from the Jewish Agency opposed the Arabs and preferred partitioning Palestine. There are four options of potential rulers of the Palestine, which are Zionist rule, Arab rule, partitione d, and a bi-national state (Tal, 2000). Zionism rules the world and this is much reflected in the United States of America. It was in 1997 when the Zionist Congress was convened by Theodore Herzl. All that has happened to the Human race since Herzl is traceable to the world conquest protocol plan. Before Herzl, political Zionism was unpopular. Zionism is accountable to all that has occured in the United States of America. Most effects of Zionism rule are negatively felt. Zionism is believed to have been sacrificing Jews for several years now, and it is still dong it up to date. There are notable achievements in the United States as a result of Zionism, but the negativities shadow them. Zionism is hence not the best preferred rule for Palestine (Hurewitz, 1998). Arabs felt that the British had unfairly favored the Jews outside Palestine and did not like foreign rule. As a result of these frustrations, the Arabs planned and attacked the Jews. To Arabs Palestine was more of a battle fi eld and its people were seen as a source of man power and taxes. The Arabs there have never been interested in Palestine as an empire. They never saw any value attached to Palestine, and that explains why there is no Palestinian Jew. Arabs rulers use Palestine as a leverage. This way, they use it to control their population by drifting their people’s anger away from their backward and oppressive regimes (Akasaka, 2007). The ongoing war in Palestine is, however, not for overcoming Israel, but it is for defining the strongest tribe among the fighters. Hence this is the main Objective of Human involvement in the war. After considering the reasons of Arabs fight in Palestine, we, as a committee does not see Arabs rule as the best suited to rule Palestine (Tal, 2000).

Materialist View of the Mind-body Problem Analysis

Materialist View of the Mind-body Problem Analysis Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the materialist view of the mind-body problem. The mind-body problem within the study of consciousness is exactly as it sounds – the difficulty with connecting the mind with the body. The mind is about mental processes, consciousness and thoughts, and the body is about the physical aspect of the brain (McLeod, 2007). This problem is known as the explanatory gap and there are many theories which attempt to understand the extent of this gap. One theory which is very popular amongst current researchers is materialism. This approach is the idea that consciousness can be completely explained by physical matter and leaves no room for the ‘non-physical’ mind (Blackmore, 2010). Materialists believe that it is only our brain functions that are important and not our subjective experiences, otherwise described as ‘matter over mind’. The opposing approach to materialism is dualism, which is the idea that our mind is more than just our brain, a.k.a. ‘mind over matter’ (â€Å"Dualism,† 2014) . However, there are very few dualists today. Most philosophers nowadays are materialists, although it cannot be denied that materialism is also not without its flaws (Blackmore, 2010). There are two main versions of materialism. One is eliminative materialism which proposes that subjective experiences do not exist and that by knowing enough about biology and the nervous system, we can also understand consciousness and therefore, it can be completely explained by neuroscience (Blackmore, 2010). The other version is reductive materialism which suggests that our mental states are identical to our physical states of the brain, meaning that subjective experiences do exist but they are not distinguishable from physical processes in the brain (Churchland, 1988). Materialism denies that it is our conscious decisions that cause us to act the way we do and instead believes that it is physical causes (Blackmore, 2010). There are strengths and weaknesses of materialism. Searle (2000) believes it is very outdated and does not explain what consciousness is, but neither does dualism and by rejecting one, it does not mean adopting the other. One strength of materialism is that it avoids the problem of dualism which is that consciousness and physical matter are thought of as two separate substances, meaning that the interaction between them cannot be explained. Materialists argue that if our minds are the same as our brains and not two separate substances, then there is no need to explain how one causes the other. For dualism to be correct, the interaction between the two substances would have to work both ways, meaning that any change in consciousness must be accompanied by a change in the brain, and any change in the brain must also be accompanied by a change in consciousness. However, the latter is not true which suggests that dualism does not work (Blackmore, 2010). Materialists believe that consciousness is identical to brain states. However, according to Leibniz’s law, if two entities are to be identical, they must have the same properties (Blackman, 2008). For materialism to be correct, all properties of the brain would also have to be properties of consciousness, which is not true as mental states have properties that brain states do not, such as subjective experiences. Materialism believes that our subjective experiences cannot be studied in an objective way as they are not a physical entity and non-entities cannot be studied by science (Blackman, 2008). However, Searle (2000) argues that they can. He believes that by asking people about their subjective experiences, for example, how it feels to experience pain, that we can study this objectively. One weakness of materialism is that it ignores the aspect of how it feels to be conscious by denying that subjective experiences exist or that they are not distinctive from functions in the brain (Blackmore, 2010). Patterns of brain activation cannot explain how it feels to be conscious and aware of experiences. Miller et al. (2009) demonstrated how we cannot tell what someone is experiencing by looking at images of their brain activation. This was shown by strong individual differences in patterns of brain activation amongst participants while they were all doing the same memory task. Materialists believe that by doing the same memory task, all participants are experiencing the same thing and therefore the patterns of their brain activation should all be the same. However, as this is not the case, it provides evidence that eliminative materialism does not work and that subjective experiences do exist as participants must have had different experiences from one another even though they were doing the same task. This also suggests that reductive materialism cannot work as the variation within participants shows that our subjective experiences must not be identical to our brain states. Nagel (1974) explains how subjective experiences are such a crucial aspect of being conscious by comparing humans to bats. We could never know what it would really be like to be a bat because we could never share the same subjective experiences as them. Even if we were magically transformed into a bat, we would still have our own memories and intelligence, meaning we would not have the same experience that normal bats do (Blackmore, 2010). He makes the point that in order to even begin to form an idea of what it is like to be a bat (or even another person) we must adopt their point of view. The same applies to Searle’s argument about pain – it seems impossible that anyone would ever be able to have the same experience of someone else’s mental state as their perceptions of the same experience could be entirely different (Churchland, 1988). This stresses how important subjective experiences are as we all have our own different viewpoints meaning that we experience things differently and therefore these experiences cannot be understood from looking at a brain scan. This also suggests why materialism is not the answer to the mind-body problem. However, it also argues against Searle’s theory that subjective experiences can be studied objectively as, even after asking about them, we still do not know exactly what it is like to experience it ourselves. Materialisms main strength is that it proposes that consciousness is not different from the brain, meaning that how one causes the other does not have to be explained and therefore, eliminates the problem of the explanatory gap. However, this can also be viewed as a major weakness of the theory the two cannot be identical as our mental states have properties that our brain states do not share. Materialism does not sufficiently account for the role of our subjective experiences in consciousness. It either completely eliminates their role or it claims that they are simply the same as our physical brain states. References All About Philosophy. (2014). Dualism. Retrieved from http://www.allaboutphilosophy.org/dualism.htm Blackman, R. (2008). Churchland, Matter and Consciousness. Retrieved from: http://reidblackman.com/pdf/reidBlackman.churchland.pdf Blackmore, S. (2010). Consciousness: An introduction. 2nd edition. Routledge. Churchland, P, M. (1988). Matter and Consciousness. Revised edition. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. McLeod, S. A. (2007). Mind Body Debate. Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org/mindbodydebate.html Miller, M.B., Donovan, C. L., Sokol-Hessner, P., German, E., Van Horn, J.D., Wolford, G.L. (2009). Unique and persistent individual patterns of brain activity across different memory retrieval tasks. NeuroImage, 48, 625-635. Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435-450. Searle, J. (2000). Consciousness. Annual Reviews of Neuroscience, 23, 557 – 578.

Effect of violence seen on Television Essay -- essays research papers

The Effects of Violence Seen on Television   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  One Saturday morning when I was five years old, I was watching an episode of the Roadrunner on television. As Wile Coyote was pushed off a cliff by the roadrunner for the fourth or fifth time, I started laughing uncontrollably. I then watched a Bugs Bunny show and started laughing whenever I saw Elmer Fudd shoot Daffy Duck and his bill went twirling around his head. The next day, I pushed my brother off a cliff and shot my dog to see ifs its head would twirl around.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Obviously, the last sentence is not true. The example above is an exaggeration of the effects of violence on television can have on children. To a five-year-old child, Daffy Duck and Bugs Bunny are the pinnacle of â€Å"cool,† and they see nothing wrong with the violent stunts seen on television. The average child watches about two and half hours of television a day and witnesses twenty violent acts on those television shows each hour. In most actions movies, there is always a bad guy and a good guy. From observation of children, most children would prefer to be the bad guy because â€Å"the bad guy gets to the cool stuff,† as one child told me whom I was babysitting when I asked him why he wanted to be the evil monster in Power Rangers Dinothunder movie. What kinds of problems is this causing for our youth?   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Children often behave differently after they have watched violent programs on tel...